When
CBC president Hubert Lacroix announced 800 staff layoffs in February of
this year, citing a $171 million short-fall, he implied that the
recession and a drop in television advertising revenues were to blame.
Friends believes that explanation is about 35% correct, in that the
recession, combined with changes in the advertising market, have
reduced CBC’s revenues in the current year by as much as $70 million.
How did that escalate to $171 million? Two decisions by the
management of CBC’s English Television network, both taken well before
the onset of the recession one year ago, set the stage.
Since the inception of CBC Television in 1954, Hockey Night in
Canada has been a network mainstay. From 2002 to 2008, the CBC paid the
NHL $60 million each year for the right to broadcast games and made an
annual ‘profit’ on Hockey Night in Canada in the range of $50 million.
The big audiences for the double-headers on Saturday nights followed by
the non-stop broadcasts during the playoffs bring in significant ad
revenues and produce almost half of the CBC English TV’s total
prime-time audience. That ‘profit’ was available to subsidize other CBC
programs.
Three years ago, when CBC started negotiations with the league for a
new agreement, the price was significantly raised to well over $100
million a year. CTV and TSN, with access to cable revenues not
available to the CBC, had already stolen away curling, the Olympics and
the Grey Cup. So rather than run the risk of losing hockey, the CBC met
the NHL’s terms. CBC’s managers reasoned that a strong economy would
boost ad revenues so the greatly increased costs would become
affordable during the six-year duration of the contract.
This decision, taken in early 2007, under former president Robert
Rabinovitch, locked in a cost increase of about $50 million a year. As
we now know, the advertising market almost immediately started
crumbling even before the economy fell into recession.
Advertising space has been going unsold and what is being sold is at
a much reduced price – about 20% less. The result: between the 2007 and
2008 NHL seasons, CBC had a reduction in its hockey ‘net revenue’ of
something in the neighbourhood of $70 million. And this hit is not a
one-season wonder. It promises to continue right through the six-year
life of the NHL contract.
The second decision, in the early months of 2008, was to bid for two
American game shows, Wheel of Fortune and Jeopardy! To win the shows,
CBC had to out-bid CTV which had run both for many years.
A cruel fact of the TV world is that advertisers desire, and will
pay for, younger viewers. But with three-quarters of Jeopardy!’s
audience over 50, CBC has found advertisers less than interested in
these shows and their audiences.
The network had also hoped that running these shows at the same time
as the American broadcasts, in other words ‘simulcasting’ them, would
boost the audience. While that happened, those viewers were lost to CBC
when it returned to Canadian programming at 8 pm.
So, the Jeopardy! and Wheel of Fortune decision has ended up costing
CBC about $20 million a year. And because the agreement is for five
years, this cost, like the hockey loss, has become structural; a
continuing drag on the Corporation.
If you have any information that might help FRIENDS flesh out details of this story, please leave comments below.
Anonymous — Jan 11, 2010 - 12:37 am MT
If the CBC fails to increase it's viewership and listenership, it must be rationalized. Private broadcasters are failing in the global recession, so why should the Canadian taxpayer, most of whom have no use for the CBC, continue to subsidize such a huge white elephant..???
lingosteve — Dec 01, 2009 - 12:27 pm MT
The sooner the public lifeline to the CBC is cut, the better. The CBC is not competitive. Their news stories lack balance, consistently presenting only one side of any story, the one that conforms to their own political bias. They are not professional, not entertaining and should be taken off the public trough as soon as possible.
Joe Clark — Nov 12, 2009 - 08:33 pm MT
You haven’t sourced your numbers. They’re estimates (i.e., you made them up), and Friends has a credibility problem when it waxes hypothetical about the CBC.
FCB — Nov 13, 2009 - 03:48 pm MT
FRIENDS has made up none of these figures. All are based on solid, covert research. To reveal the identity of FRIENDS' sources would only compromise their employment in CBC and advertising agencies. Needless to say, we would appreciate further precision.
Gen@CulturalHRC — Nov 12, 2009 - 04:25 pm MT
Wow, talk about mismanagement! Thanks for sharing the details of the short-fall. I'll be looking forward to more details as they arise.
Post new comment