This paper, through an in-depth analysis of three major convergence decisions, tracks the CRTC’s contemporary interpretation of “access,” and its subtle shift in meaning that has occurred over the decisions.
- Following the convergence decisions it appears the CRTC may yet be persuaded to more adopt a diverse opinion-based definition of “access.”
- The Committee clearly recognizes the essential function of “access” as the duty to provide a diversity of viewpoints in the form of editorial opinions to the public, supporting a more rigorous enforcement of the Broadcasting Act mandate for the protection of diversity by the CRTC.
- The notion of access allowing the diverse representation of opinion in the media has evolved as the key principle of objective communication in Canadian society.
Click here to view PDF file (288KB)